Dr. Hiroko Karan:
Welcome to Workshop 4B
titled "Asian Americans in the Aftermath of 9/11." We have
four distinguished panelists today. I will introduce each of
them first and then ask them to each person to speak from five
to ten minutes and then we have kind of an interactive
session.
Our first speaker is Dr.
Lung Chi Chen. Dr. Chen is an Associate Professor at
Department of Environmental Medicine at the New York
University School of Medicine and Director of Core Services
NYU-EPA PM Center, in Tuxedo, New York. Dr. Chen is here to
speak about the "Environmental Health Impact Related to the
World Trade Center Disaster."
The second speaker is Ms.
Renata Huang who is an independent video journalist who has
produced programs for Channel Thirteen: "Harmony & Spirit:
Chinese Americans in New York;" and "Running: The Race for
City Council." Ms. Huang is an alumna of the Columbia
University Graduate School of Journalism. She will speak about
"Asian Americans in Flux: Forgotten Stories After 9/11."
Our third speaker is Mr.
Joseph Wei. But Mr. Wei was not able to come so Wendy Chung is
here to present. Mr. Wei was the City Editor from the Chinese
Newspaper World Journal. Are you from the World Journal?
Wendy Chung:
Yes, I’m from the World
Journal.
Dr. Hiroko Karan:
Ok. Very good. Originally he
said he was going to speak about "The Role of Chinese Press
after 9/11."
Forth (but not least) is Mr.
Edward A. Watkins who is Deputy Commissioner of the New York
State Federal Programs. He is going to speak about "Housing
Opportunities for Asian Americans." Those are our four
speakers. I’ll ask Dr. Chen to start.
Lung Chi Chen:
Actually I had prepared a
more formal presentation. I have a PowerPoint, but I don’t
know if you have a projector. It might be easier to explain
what we’re doing here. I don’t know if anybody can see it.
Let’s just go over really quickly. We were one of the first
scientists to go to the World Trade Center area to collect
samples and do an impact assessment, and look at what were the
consequences of the disaster. This is a large team involving a
lot of people with many of our technicians, researchers and
scientists who looked into what’s going on with the collapse.
As you can see from this photograph, this is right after the
first tower collapsed, you can see that there is a huge among
of debris being spilled out.
What we like to do is look
at what was the impact. A lot of people were affected,
inhaling that dust, as you probably heard from newspapers,
people complaining about is this toxic or not. Also the fire
after the collapse lasted until sometime in December. Some
people complained about smell and worried about health. What
we did is that we focused our investigation in the particular
matter – the particles in the air, the dust you can see, and
the small pieces you cannot see. So we’re focusing on that
aspect of the investigation because from our experience from
previous studies, we know that particle exposure can have an
impact on health and increase the incidence of death.
Recently, one of our departments published a paper about the
increase in urban particular concentration was associated with
increasing cancer deaths. So we’re focusing on that, and also
a lot of people already found out that an increase in
particles also increases the amount of asthma attacks. We
focused on that aspect of the research. You can see this is a
map of Lower Manhattan.
The second and third day, we
had a team of technicians from the NYU Downtown Hospital, who
went around the World Trade Center area just collecting bags
so that our laboratory could do further analysis. We collected
two sets of samples. The first day we only went to Ground Zero
and then stopped. The second day we were a little bit more
extensive. We went around the area and collected surrounding
the whole Ground Zero. We wanted to see if there was any
difference in distribution and what was the concentration of
the toxic materials that we could find. Here are the findings
of a photograph that my technicians took. This is September 12th.
You can see that everything’s covered. It’s very eerie. You
can see that nobody's around and everything’s covered in dust.
It’s almost a snow effect. Here is a student that went to
collect the particles. Then the Friday after that day, we
collected the air sample, because that’s what you and I are
going to breathe.
In the NYU Downtown
Hospital, which is about three blocks away from Ground Zero,
we set up an array of instruments to collect…Actually this
hospital was set up in the turn of the century just in case
there was a terrorist attack. At that time, the turn of the
century they set up this hospital. With all of these financial
institutions, what if something happens? We need a hospital.
It was very good foresight. It helped us a lot to set up the
sampling on the second floor of the hospital. We put in some
of the instruments to collect different samples and to get an
index of what the health effects were going to be.
Then in November we tried to
get into different apartments also to try to see what the
indoor particles looked like. But there were a lot of
obstacles in terms of the bureaucracy and all that. We didn’t
get in until around November 19th, and we went into
two locations – one at Liberty Street and one at Trinity
Place. The location was just right South of Ground Zero. You
can see we took some photographs. At that time, Ground Zero
was pretty much cleaned up and the debris is being removed,
but the apartment is very devastated. All of the windows are
blown open. In the inside, even some of the cabinets have been
blown up. Everything is covered with dust and what we did is
we went around and tried to collect the particles using a
scientific method. Here is one of the examples of collecting
samples.
Also, a couple blocks from
here, at Hunter College, we had another station that was
operating before September 11th, so it’s a very
good reference site, so we can compare the difference between
downtown and uptown and use it as a reference point. If
downtown is very high, then we know there is danger. We looked
at a variety of substances that I’m not going to go into the
details of. One of the first things we looked at was asbestos,
because people worry about, what is asbestos? How much is it?
And is it going to have any long term consequences on us?
Actually, it’s very lucky
that for some reason whatever insulation they used (asbestos
they use in insulation), it did not really get suspended in
the air. This is one of the tables that showed the composition
of that. As you can see, in every sample that we had, the
asbestos is present only in very, very small amounts. It was a
very great relief to us that we don’t have to worry about the
asbestos impact.
The other thing that we
found out was this was an example of one of the particles we
looked at under the microscope. You can see that these are
very big particles. Your human heads are probably around that
diameter, and here are some of the examples. If you look at
this part, those are glass beads that got heated up to very,
very high temperatures and burst. It’s very interesting. That
indicates the fires going on. They got heated to very high
temperatures. They heated up and melted and some of them burst
open. That’s what happens. There were a lot of minerals. Those
are fiberglass insulation.
Audience Member:
You mean you found the
particles of glass beads from the building materials
themselves?
Lung Chi Chen:
We just collected it from
the site itself, so it’s there. The other thing we found out
that relieved us was that the majority of the particles on the
ground are very big particles. Ninety-five percent of the
particles are larger than ten micrometers in diameter. Your
hair is probably ten micrometers in diameter, so that is one
tenth of your hair. But it is still very big, and because it
is very big, it cannot be inhaled. So you are protected
against this exposure. That is very good.
The other thing we found out
is the pH, the acidity of the particles. We put a certain
amount of particles in the water and used a pH measure. What
we found out is that the pH is around 11 or 12. Your body has
a pH of about 7, which is neutral. When you have a pH of 11 or
12, it’s very alkaline. It’s very irritating because it’s
coming from the building material – the chips of cement that
are in that. And that’s why people are complaining about their
irritations in their upper airways. But they should not worry
about the long term consequence because the particles are very
big and they cannot get deep into your lungs. So you won’t
have long term consequences, just irritation. You will feel it
when you go down there. You can smell it almost.
Also, people worry about the
toxic materials – the metals. Some of the trace metals are
very toxic. Chromium, nickel…these are all associated with
toxic material. Also, some of the computer parts were burned.
They’re worrying about some of the material being released
from that. To our comfort, none of that is very high. We can
measure it. It’s higher than your backyard dirt. But it is
still very small. So we should not worry about it. Now people
worry about lead. Did they have lead pipes all that? And what
we found out is that the lead concentration is there and it’s
about 300 ppm. The EPA says that if you have over 400 ppm lead
in your playground sand, then you have to remove that. So this
is not to the point that you should really worry about it. But
at the same time, this is toxic material and you should treat
it as toxic material, because some of the alkaline toxic
material is there.
We also have real-time
monitoring of the airborne particles around the World Trade
Center area. As you can see, compared to the concentrations
here at Hunter College, we can see that in November and
October it’s very high downtown. Compared to lower Manhattan,
downtown is 3-10 times higher in airborne concentration. But
after November and late October, the concentration is very
similar. Also, we had a very warm fall last year, so there was
a lot pollution at that time. You can se that the
concentrations go up and down.
Usually at night, the area
is still so they do not move around that much so the pollution
would accumulate. A lot of people open their window at night
which is not very good because then all the pollution is
coming into your house. Close your window, close the air
conditioning vent. Don’t let outside air come into your house.
Also, we looked at the size of the particles and you can see
that something happened between late October and November. So
either the practice of the cleanup effort or whatever, there
was something going on during that period of time. Before that
we know that pollution is dominating by the World Trade Center
area. But after that it is not. So it’s pretty good. I think
that’s pretty much what I have.
On May 1st, we
just got a grant from New York National Institute of
Environmental Health Science to look into this issue further.
The funding is one of the largest in the country. We’re going
to look into firemen and we’re going to recruit about 300
firemen that we’ll classify to high and low exposure level.
We’re going to look at their lungs and see if they have any
differences from the exposure during that period of time. We
probably will survey around 6,000 residents in the area of
lower Manhattan to see if there’s an increase in asthma-like
symptoms. We’re also going to look at the animal response to
the exposure of this pollution. It is a very large effort.
They gave us 4.6 million dollars.
Audience Member:
Is that a private study?
Lung Chi Chen:
The one I described – these
first two - were private. NYU has two big centers a particular
matter health center, where we supported that particular type
of research right there. Around mid-December they gave us
$50,000 to cover some of the supplies. Then we got a $1.3
million grant for that.
Audience Member:
Are you going to publish it?
Lung Chi Chen:
Two of my colleagues already
sent in two papers. One is American Daily Perspective.
The other one was just sent in. I’m preparing my report. And
if you’d like to give me your email address, I’d like to send
you a preliminary report. We have one registered and the last
few days, for a class project, we went to other parts of the
city to do another set of sampling just to see what is the
current level now? We’d like to know the indoor vs. outdoor
pollution and also the third floor vs. 30th floor.
We want to see with the height if there is any difference?
Audience Member:
How come we haven’t heard of
this study yet?
Lung Chi Chen:
One of the toxicology
studies that we have is actually in cooperation with ETA and
we send the samples down to them to do toxicology testing, and
they have to analyze the responses. The problem with ETA is
this quote/end quote "high level one" research or something
like that. They have very stringent quarantine control, so
even though they finished the study in January, they haven’t
published it yet and they will not release the result. I have
the result, but they will not let me publicly say that yet.
Audience Member:
What has been going on with
the research?
Lung Chi Chen:
We pretty much follow what
the government does. We’re a highly respected institute, so
what we do is follow the NIH (National Institute of Health)
guidelines so we’re pretty confident about what we’re doing
here. We’re going to initiate another study about the effect
on animals. The EPA did not set up a similar type of exposure
monitoring until, I think, October. There’s some other company
that is OSA (Occupational Safety Association). They have some
samples.
But the problem is that
particular time is that nobody was talking to each other. We
tried to say we could help. We have these stations set up that
could help people. We can help interpret some of the data. But
the problem is that nobody gave me any sense that they wanted
to cooperate or extend themselves. So it was very frustrating.
Audience Member:
How about the city of New
York?
Lung Chi Chen:
We did not have that much
cooperation from the city or the state either. We kind of…I
don’t blame them. There were a lot of points that we wanted to
go into different areas to collect but because of security
reasons, they would not have that.
Dr. Hiroko Karan:
Thank you very much. We
would like to have more conversation, but three other
presenters have to go. Dr. Chen has to leave a little earlier,
so I allowed the audience to ask questions. But from now on, I
think I’ll ask all presenters to go and then people will
interact with the audience. The next speaker is Ms. Renata
Huang and she will speak about "Asian Americans in Flux:
Forgotten Stories after 9/11."
Ms. Renata Huang:
Obviously I won’t have all
the forgotten stories, but I’ll have some of them to share
with you. Right now I’m working on several different videos
about Asian Americans after 9/11, one of them being a big
picture about Chinatown, the fact that it was in the frozen
zone and what happened to the economy, the fact that because
the infrastructure was cut so much, a lot of people lost jobs
and tourism went down.
Then another one that I’m
working on are individual stories about displaced workers. I’m
looking at a lot of garment workers who are now finished
taking job training courses who were laid off after 9/11 and
I’m following them to see if they’re actually going to find
jobs. So far it doesn’t look good for them.
The third one I’m looking at
is South Asians after 9/11. As we all know South Asians have
been separated on a different level. The fact that we have
1200 Muslims who are both Arab and South Asian who’ve been
picked up, arrested and detained by the INS for violations,
and their entire families have to be deported back to their
homelands. We have the situation of taxi drivers who are not
considered direct victims of 9/11 despite the fact that they
lost a lot of money for at least five or six months after
9/11. They’re not getting any compensation. They’re also not
getting any compensation from Red Cross, despite the fact that
Red Cross is not supposed to be looking at your legal status
and should help you anyway. Of course hate crimes is a huge
problem with South Asians.
The forth documentary, I’m
looking at is Asian American philanthropy, the fact that so
many organizations did so much. A lot of times people in the
mainstream don’t look at these stories. We have organizations
that did a lot of great work. They had soup in these little
containers and they brought it down to Ground Zero. They went
down to Pier 94 and literally wrote checks out to people who
were grieving and because they lost their families. They gave
out I think about 2.5 million dollars.
Then a fifth one I’m working
on is about grieving families and I’m interviewing families
with lost loved ones and just looking at how they get up every
day.
Audience Member:
Are they available?
Ms. Renata Huang:
The ones I’m doing right
now?
Audience Member:
Right now and also before.
Ms. Renata Huang:
Yeah, definitely they’re
available. The one I worked on "Harmony & Spirit: Chinese
Americans in New York City" you can buy on Channel 13. In
fact, I think on the 14th of March, they’re going
to be replaying that and probably selling it on TV again. Then
there’s the City Council elections which is recent.
I happened to be running for
my life that day from the World Trade Center, because it was
Primary day and the area that I was filming was lower
Manhattan and I was about four blocks away and like an idiot I
went closer to the building and then had to run back like
everybody else. That’s kind of what led me with conversations
with the federation to do this since I had some footage
already. Why not tell some stories.
Dr. Hiroko Karan:
Thank you. Ms. Wendy Chung.
Ms. Wendy Chung:
First of all, I would like
to talk about the Journal a little bit as some of you might
not be familiar with this. The World Journal is the biggest
Asian American Newspaper in North America. I brought four
copies, so if you’re interested, feel free to take a copy
after this. Our separation in North America is almost 400,000
and almost 100,000 in New York and the New York area. Our
readers are mainly Chinese Americans that speak and read
Chinese. Some of them are immigrants. Some of them are garment
workers, restaurant workers, or housewives, students. It has
been a major information source for a lot of Chinese Americans
that don’t speak English in America.
After September 11th,
we have dedicated a large part of our coverage to either
September 11th issues or related issues. Also, we
have looked at the assistance from the government, like FEMA
assistance, SBA loans, and also assistance from Red Cross,
Safe Horizon and World Mission and so forth. I still remember
at one point we put out a story that Safe Horizon is accepting
applications from displaced workers. Right after we put out
the story, the next day, there are long lines in Chinatown,
hundreds of thousands of people lined up outside CCBA and all
over Canal Street and the police had to set up roadblocks to
keep order.
I actually brought some
newspapers because I wanted to show you what we did after
September 11th. We mainly focused on stories that
the mainstream may not touch on or that they’re not interested
in. Like this one. This September 14th, three days
after the disaster, and this woman…this is taken in the Armory
on 25th Street where the Family Assistance Center
was located. Outside there are a lot of families looking for
their loved ones. They’re holding pictures and also the
description of their lost family members. This woman is a
teacher and her husband was lost in one of the buildings of
the World Trade Center.
We did a lot of stories
about the families of Chinese heritage. This is only one of
them. This one I was just mentioning briefly. We took a lot of
snapshots in Chinatown because Chinatown actually is very,
very close to the immediate disaster area. But it is cluttered
by a lot of mainstream media. Still now Chinatown is fighting
for government money, loans, grants and business people have
been suffering, and even now after eight months, they’re still
not recovering at all. This is about people giving their own
money to the World Trade Center victims. This is about the
vigils in Chinatown. Chinese people have actually been very
generous about giving money and donations to the World Trade
Center victims. Also, they have expressed a lot in different
activities – vigils, or like we mentioned earlier, a lot of
organizations wrote checks to people and the victim’s
families. This one is just another of the vigils. This is a
series of articles that we did one month after the disaster.
We did a series of stories
about how business hurt in the Chinatown area. The first one
is about the restaurant business. At that time Chinatown was
almost closed – all the streets were blocked and it was almost
closed for two weeks. Business suffered a loss. This is a very
good example. This business is on Mott St. and they have four
stars from the New York Times and they have a good reputation,
but they still have no business. Also, we interviewed a lot of
different restaurant owners about how they’re doing, and they
all expressed that they’re having a very hard time. Even two
months ago, I think it was six months after the disaster, we
rebuilt again. We went to the restaurants.
We went to garment
factories. We talked to workers, and still they’re expressing
the same thing – we are still either dislocated and out of
business and a lot of people just don’t get assistance at all,
particularly people north of Canal St. because the government
has drawn their assistance line on Canal St. According to the
Asian American Federation’s Survey Findings, most of the
garment factories in Chinatown are located north of Canal St.
So a lot of those are garment factory workers who lost their
job after September 11th and they couldn’t find any
assistance at all from the government.
I still remember one of the
groups called World Mission. They were the first group to give
grants to dislocated workers north of Canal St. After that
news was printed, the next day at least 1,500 workers flooded
to where the application forms could be taken. Then it got
some attention from television and some other mainstream
papers. We also did personal stories about volunteers who give
a lot of their time and love in order to help.
We also printed a lot of
pictures of Chinatown of when it was closed and when it was
heavily guarded by National Guards, State Troopers, and NYPD.
At that time, a lot of residents or business people in
Chinatown found it difficult to go back to their homes or go
back to their businesses, because they had to show different
forms of id. And there are some stories about illegal
immigrants who don’t have proper identification so they
couldn’t go home for the whole week or even two weeks because
they could not show an id. So this one is about entrance. This
one is about the Disaster Assistance Center at 141 Worth
Street. This is one of the stories that I just told – people
lining up on Mott St. outside the CCPA where they had a lot of
conferences. They even closed the street because so many
people are there.
There were actually a lot of
concerned citizens, community groups and organizations that
have been putting a lot of effort in getting the government to
give some attention to Chinatown, to include Chinatown as far
as grants, loans, and now it’s about rebuilding. Now it is
still difficult for Chinatown to get their fair share when it
comes to the funding in rebuilding.
This is about unemployed
restaurant workers getting unemployment from the Department of
Labor. There are a lot of workers – some have completely lost
their jobs, but a lot of them (like garment workers) only work
three or four days the most and they have to support a family
of four or six or even more. So it is really difficult for
them.
This is about the mother of
a victim. This is a very touching story. That victim could
have escaped but he stayed there just to assist others and
help out others. She found that out because his mother just
coincidently watched TV and saw a shot of her son and what she
saw was her son running here and there helping out people, but
her son never came back. So it’s a very touching story. This
is a story that we tell. The mainstream media would not pick
it up.
This is some of the efforts
they’ve been making to get politicians to come to Chinatown.
They wanted to ask them to come back to Chinatown to
revitalize Chinatown, to spend money, and tell people in the
rest of the city and the rest of the country that Chinatown is
reopened and come back, we need you. These are some of the
papers that I have with me today. We have a lot more but
that’s all I brought.
Dr. Hiroko Karan:
Thank you very much. I think
in fact the study of the environment and then documenting it
and the publication, particularly for those who do not have
English capabilities, then this is the main source of
information. And now we’ll have housing availability, which is
another important issue.
Edward Watkins:
Well I think I have the
difficult one because our Agency of Human Rights is probably
one of the oldest human/civil rights agencies in the country.
It’s over 55 years old. As a law enforcement agency, it’s
enforcing human rights laws and civil rights laws of the state
as well as in contract with Equal Opportunities Commission, as
well as the Department of Housing and Urban Development. My
interest is that on September 11th I happened to
have been on my way down to 7 World Trade Plaza. I had just
recently retired after 33 years with the EOC. I am the liaison
for the EOC and federal government and federal programs where
we take in federal funds to do enforcement of civil rights.
That particular day I
happened to be on the phone with Buffalo at 7:30 in the
morning. I had an appointment at 11:00 to be at the World
Trade Plaza, so I was going to be at EOC at 7 World Trade
Center at around 9:30 or 10:00. Instead of leaving my house at
my normal time, where I would have been down there around
9:00, I left an hour later because I was waiting for a report
to come in. I was on my way out when the first plane hit. Most
of my colleagues at the EOC escaped unharmed from 7 World
Trade Center as the building collapsed. But the interesting
part about it is that all the government documents on the
investigations that we were doing on civil rights were
destroyed. So you can imagine all your case files being
destroyed that were active.
The fortunate part about it
obviously is that the computers are back up and information
was stored in Washington. But at the division of human rights,
where cases are filed, we had the actual copies of the
complaints. I guess there’s an irony in there that the state
ended up with all the records. We were able to either
duplicate records and have them available for the Equal
Opportunities Commission to be able to do anything that they
needed to do or to have any document that they might have
needed.
Last year, the Department of
Housing and Urban Development issued one of four partnership
grants in the country for $250,000 with AAFE (Asian American
for Equality) to do outreach and education in the Asian and
immigrant community. So we had just gotten started when
September 11th hit and delayed us to some degree
from reaching out to the Asian community to deal with housing
issues in terms of discrimination. Ironic again. As I had a
report here coming in the next couple days, I checked with our
Information Technology Unit (it used to be Management
Information, and now it’s IT) and I said, well since September
11th, how many cases have actually come in from
Asian community or Muslims or other Southern Asian countries
to see what the impact might have been on the number of
complaints. We’ve been reading in the paper (obviously your
paper) talking about bias incidents, talking about increase of
discrimination, whether it be employment or housing. And I can
only find one case. One case. And it was an employer.
Now my job is to go out
under this particular grant to the Asian community and to
educate on the rights under the civil rights laws, as well as
the state’s human rights laws so that they will be better
informed on how to protect themselves in terms of housing
discrimination, predatory loans, or on the other side, the
employment areas of discrimination. So AAFE and my shop have
been – we’ve done a press conference in Queens. We did another
one in Chinatown. Just recently, one of the good things the
governor did do was I think we were one of the few agencies
that got an increase for investigators to be hired, especially
in the housing side of the fence, which I oversee, where we
have two investigators here right now, who just came on within
the last month. They’re going through their training phases
now on how to handle discrimination investigation incidents
and also doing the outreach education portion of that
contract. Their contract runs for about two years.
You will be seeing our unit
going out into the Asian community to give out literature
materials and education on the law, what people’s rights are,
because there’s a tendency I guess in the Asian community not
to report violations of human rights and civil rights. That
may be for many other reasons, cultural or whatever, but my
[goal] is to break that stereotype to get you the information.
I’ll be able to get it to any organizations are out there to
share with their constituencies and to assure that their
rights are enforced. Now I know in dealing with law
enforcement, whether it be immigration or other things,
there’s a shyness. But here is the one area where Asians
should not be shy in any manner, shape or form, to have their
rights enforced. We don’t go into immigration laws or
anything. If you have a valid complaint, we investigate, we
look at the data, we look at the evidence, we make a decision
and we issue it.
You can have anything from
your salary, housing, we can put a stop on a lease if someone
is found to be discriminatory against someone where they will
be held and a subpoenaed and ordered by to court to stop them
from renting that apartment. Or if it’s a sale of a house.
We’ve had predatory loans cases where people prayed on either
the elderly or people because of their inability to speak
English or read or know what they’re getting themselves into.
We’ve had people’s homes restored to them. We’ve had interest
rates reduced. We’ve had contracts changed to correct whatever
was being done wrong to them.
This is a service. It’s what
you pay for in your taxes. As citizens, you’re entitled to it.
My job is to see that the federal law and the state law are
being complied with in terms of discrimination – whether it be
on the employment or the housing side – and to ensure that an
individual who is complaining gets a fair hearing at a fair
date.
Normal procedures are that a
person will come to one of our regional offices. They would
see someone like Helen or Iris to file a complaint. Helen’s
bilingual so that assists and helps when we deal with the
Asian community. Iris is bilingual to deal with the Hispanic
type issues. We’re also going to be bringing on a director of
the Asian project who hopefully will be of Asian heritage and
hopefully bilingual as well. I understand you always have to
get through the civil service commission. But we’re fortunate
that we were able to get Helen through the system and bring
them onboard so you can interact with someone who hopefully
can speak the language. If now, AAFE is also available to give
us translators so that we are able to serve you in the
community.
I think the difficult part
has been trying to get the message out to your constituency.
We have been using the Asian and South Asian press. I know
your newspaper has covered us as well in what we’re trying to
do out there in the community. On the 17th I know
we’re doing one out in Long Island City. It’s one of the
affiliates of AAFE. We’re doing one Bengali; we’re doing
Indian, Bangladesh, Pakistani. We’re also taking out
materials, and I hope you’ll take this stuff (I don’t want to
bring it back to the office) and share it with your colleagues
and constituents. We doing Korean, Mandarin, Cantonese,
Bengali (I think), translating housing documents into those
particular languages, so that again it will be of assistance
in terms of advising people what their rights and what the law
protects them from. I would hope that if any of you…I believe
our phone numbers are mixed in there.
If you need to discuss
something about housing or employment discrimination, we’re
open and free to provide you that assistance. We will be able
to take complaints on site whenever we go to a particular
conference or educational seminar so that we can meet our
requirements under the contract to educate, to bring in
complaints where there are valid complaints to bring into the
system and to adjudicate them in whatever form. I think one of
the things you need to understand as well, under our housing
contract with HUD is one of the reason we’re getting federal
money is because our state law is considered to be
substantially equivalent to the federal law. One of the
goodies that is in the federal law, so that you know, is that
when there is a hiring discrimination, what we call probable
cause, the complainer has the option to elect to go into court
or into our administrative proceedings and have a lawyer
provided to them free, so that the individual does not have to
extend any cost in terms of a probable cause finding if they
want to take it into state court or our administrative law
proceedings where we have an administrative law judge who has
a hearing.
We do have a housing person
who handles those particular cases as they come out and
there’s an election or an option to proceed in whichever legal
forum the individual person chooses to go to. So there you
have it. That’s the case that’s conducted free of charge. If a
probable cause hiring has been found, you have a free option
to go into state court with a lawyer being provided by the
state to prosecute that particular case. I don’t think you can
get any better than that.
We know there’s
discrimination out there, yes we know it. But I can’t go out
and solicit and bring it in. People have to be aware of it.
They have to go to any one of our eleven regional offices – we
have one in lower Manhattan, upper Manhattan, Brooklyn, all
around the state – Rochester, Buffalo… We have a sexual
harassment unit in Brooklyn. We have an AIDS unit in Brooklyn.
They’re all there to provide services to the residents of New
York. We’re there. You should utilize us. This will hopefully
get that barrier of a law enforcement agency that might be
interested in other things, but I’m not. I’m interested in
protecting your human or your civil rights under the law.
That is what I need in terms
of your organizations or the press passing the word out that
we’re user friendly, we’re available to serve the citizens of
New York and that hopefully we will do a decent job. I can
tell you on the housing cases, we pretty much wrap those cases
up within 100 days from they’re filed. This keeps our feet to
the fire to try to eliminate those cases in terms of
investigation within 100 days, otherwise I have to write you a
letter and explain why I didn’t do it in 100 days and you
would know why. Normally that is bankruptcy or some other
reason that keeps that case from moving forward, but we like
to get them out in 100 days.
Dr. Hiroko Karan:
Thank you very much. That
was very informative.
Edward Watkins:
Well I’d be glad to bring
people in to discuss it. If it’s a big enough conference, I
can get the commissioner to come in and address the group as
well. We’re appointees of the governor so our goal is to make
everybody look good, but my [goal] is to uphold the law, and
I’ve been doing it for 44 years, or longer I think now. I may
not look like it, but I’ve done it.
Audience Member:
Do you have any
Chinese/English bilingual investigators?
Edward Watkins:
In terms of investigators,
we may have one, a director from the Philippines who is the
director of the office. We have MIS, the Information
Technology Field. We have a big computer system there where we
have four or five people there. In terms of the housing unit,
she is the first one we have hired. I’m looking for a director
that I’m waiting for the governor’s office to send me because
it’s above a certain level so it’s political appointment. I’m
waiting to clear that and then I will have in my own unit –
out of seven people, two of them will be of Asian backgrounds.
I’m trying to do my profile to make sure it looks good one way
or another to make sure that we have good, qualified people
who can go out and represent and take care of enforcement.
Audience Member:
Are you finding that a lot
of the complaints are a problem for Chinese people or is it a
problem for South Asians? I mean Asian is a huge umbrella and
they’re so different. It’s not like they really get together.
Edward Watkins:
Well I think part of what my
problem is, mainly through AAFE because that’s our partner.
Like I said, it’s unique that we got a grant that allows us to
partner with another group and AAFE being a recognized group,
they received a grant of $250,000. We received a grant of
$250,000 and then we collaborated together to do whatever we
need to do to get the word out. Right now, I can tell you
based on the experience of what we started with - When we
first started on substantial equivalency; we took very little
housing cases in. There were housing cases, but not to the
significant number that I’m taking in within the last two
years where I’m up to over four hundred something cases that
we’ve actually processed through the system each year now.
Out of that, I can tell you
honestly, very few, if none have come from the Asian
community, which is why when we go the grant we targeted
specifically the Asian community to bring out and educate and
say it’s okay to come to us to file a complaint. We know about
the under the table money that you have to give to get an
apartment. It’s illegal and it shouldn’t be done but then
again people are obviously desperate to get good housing or to
find employment or whatever the method might be and we’re just
saying, it’s illegal. It’s wrong. You don’t have to do that.
And that you have rights and we will protect those rights when
you come to us with the information and we’re able to
substantiate it during the course of an investigation.
Audience Member:
When you say Asian, it’s
either East or West Asian?
Edward Watkins:
I use it sort of broadly,
but yes, I mean everybody from Bangladesh to…
Audience Member:
So in other words, out of
the 400 cases that you have, what ethnicity are they mostly?
Edward Watkins:
Probably you will find more
Hispanic, black, you’ll find older people. They’ve especially
been targeted on the predatory loans. Scenarios where they
have homes and where people actually go after them to inflate
their loans to where they’re unable to pay it and then they
try to take their house away from them.
There’s a borderline. We
cover civil rights cases where either they may target you for
race, age, or sex versus criminal which would then go to
Justice or to the Attorney General because you have other
criminal type activity. We don’t do the criminal, we do the
civil rights. And if we come across the criminal, we’ll turn
it over.
Audience Member:
I have a case about a
Chinese elderly who speaks English. He lives in a HUD funded
building. And the manager says that he has too much stuff.
He’s a pack rat. But he has been moving stuff away, but
management and lawyers are coming and now he’s facing…he has
to go to court again. So he’s always asking is that an issue
of human rights?
Edward Watkins:
Well that depends on what
the motive of what the landlord is actually doing to the
individual, whether he’s basing his decision on ethnicity or
their age, their sex, their race. Those become violations. In
a landlord/tenet housing court scenario, it’s a little bit
different because that takes in different laws and statutes
and it may not by a violation of human rights or civil rights.
Most housing courts do not
get into human rights/civil rights issues. They’ll get into
the lease, the tenet, if they owe, violations or whatever, so
that you don’t really end up with the civil rights part of it,
unless it’s raised somehow by the attorney representative or
whatever. Then you still have to have a trial of facts,
probably by the judge.
They would still have the
right at the termination of that proceeding to come to us and
raise the human rights/civil rights aspect of that particular
case. But again, we would then have to see what’s the basis
for why the landlord is doing what they’re doing. And if it’s
a HUD program that’s even better at enforcing their federal
rights.
Audience Member:
I think he’s not sure.
Edward Watkins:
He should come in, because
that’s the purpose of sitting down in an interview. The
interview will either bring out the facts about what the
violation may or may not be. If it’s not a violation, then we
immediately tell them, no this does not appear to be a
violation of law, but we may know what other agencies may have
jurisdiction that we can refer them too. We often do
referrals.
Audience Member:
I just have one question for
you. In terms of your workload, how are you going about
recruiting them? And then for you, you had mentioned the
unfair funding to Chinatown. If you could talk a little bit
more about that. I know the thing about the borders of Canal,
but are there other things? And I know the comparison of Wall
St. and Chinatown, but in particular are you talking about a
specific fund or a district?
Renata Huang:
I had a really tough time,
thinking where am I going to find them. So I went first to the
unemployment lines. Eventually, because the Department of
Labor came in and gave a million dollars to Chinatown,
specifically for job training. So the answer to the Chinatown
Manpower Project as well as the Chinese American Planning
Council. So the Planning Council had for 14 years created a
new way – a new avenue for garment workers, which is a home
care attending. So I covered a class, and from that class, I
got to know some students, and I’ve been following a couple
students there.
In the Manpower Project,
there’s a nails class, where every day the students take the
subway up to the Bronx to take a class in doing nails. It’s
mostly Hispanic and African American people. They both
graduated from the classes. The classes ended a couple of
weeks ago and so far it’s been tough. It’s been really hard.
They’ve been faced with…June 15th is the last day
they can get their unemployment checks.
So as far as following
families and again really focusing on community based
organizations, I definitely tried to get away from just
focusing on Chinese people because we’re Asian American and we
really can’t forget that. I think due to sheer population and
the number of Chinese people I think it’s very easy to go and
cover stories about Chinese people, especially because of the
socioeconomic so diverse, versus say Koreans or Japanese. But
anyway, I found a Korean family and I found a Pilipino family
through various different MBOs.
Wendy Chung:
Actually there have been a
lot of issues that have focused on Chinatown as far as
government money is concerned. I talked about one of them –
FEMA. FEMA drew the arbitrary line on Canal St. South of Canal
St. you can get some of the money. Above Canal St., no. So as
I said earlier, Chinatown’s been split up now. A lot of the
factories are north of Canal St., and also a lot Chinese
people work in factories and they don’t have their fair share
as far as the government is concerned.
Recently there was an
example of Chinatown being treated unfairly. I don’t know if
you know LMDC? Recently they gave out money for repaving the
streets and roads in Lower Manhattan. And they ignored the
Chinatown area. Other parts of Lower Manhattan they put in a
lot of money into repaving the streets, but Chinatown doesn’t
get any money at all.
Some of the issues, like the
testing of air, Chinatown just doesn’t touch the radius. I
have been to a seminar given by the Department of Health, and
I asked them how many times they tested the air in Chinatown.
They only did once and they said that they only chose one
location. They didn’t even specify what location. But that’s
the only location that they took a sample of air to test.
This is another example. A
lot of those community boards, they have been attending a lot
of hearings – town hall meetings and meetings in City Hall.
Let your voices out. Ask them to increase Chinatown’s money.
Because more federal money is coming, so now is the time that
they draw plans for how the money will be used. At this stage,
if people cannot get them to make the addition to include
Chinatown, the rebuilding of Chinatown will be very difficult.
Audience Member:
I think that’s where I’m a
little confused. Because looking at Chinatown and everyone’s
talking about rebuilding Chinatown and I don’t necessarily see
– and this is probably a very politically incorrect statement
to make – but I don’t see how it was broken. I see that
definitely the fact that the frozen zone was south of Canal
and traffic was really awful, and we have maybe forty garment
factories that closed down. But even to this day, I’m visiting
a lot of factories and the last couple of months, the season
has come back and a lot of people are getting jobs.
Of course a lot of people
are not. The displaced workers say they don’t want to go back
to a situation where they’re working three days a week. They
say forget about it. But I’ve been asking that question: Of
the forty factories that closed down, are they above Canal or
are they below canal, and I cant get an answer from anybody in
Chinatown. So it seems to me as if there seems to be…Chinatown
has always been having problems due to its immigration and
congestion.
The Lower Manhattan
Development Corporation, you’re dealing with a situation where
you have a giant hole at Ground Zero, and it’s really a
situation, I think, about what needs to be rebuilt as far as
infrastructure at Ground Zero and Chinatown. So it’s very
difficult then to even have an idea of how to rebuild
Chinatown because it was not broken in that sense.
Wendy Chung:
I don’t know if you have
read the research paper of Asian American Federation? They
have a big book about how Chinatown is hurt after September 11th,
in terms of the different industries – garment industry,
restaurant industry, jewelry, tourism and even health issues.
I think that was a very important document.
Audience Member:
But we have to remember that
the document was done and surveys were taken at a certain
time. It was right after 9/11. They also admit in the report,
that’s why it’s an interim report, they’re coming out with
another one. It’s been how many months now since 9/11 and for
a time frame, that was awful. There’s no doubt about it that
after 9/11 for three months that was awful. And there’s
probably no doubt that it’s not 100% normal. I go to shops and
restaurants and I see Chinatown for a lot of Caucasians that
live around there, they don’t understand what you’re talking
about. And when I speak to people in restaurants, they tell me
it’s about 80% and they still complain because they want it to
be 100%, but they understand.
Another thing I want to add
is that Paul at 32 Mott St. is a real spokesperson for
Chinatown and he told me that there was a little delegation of
businesspeople who went to D.C. to complain about what was
happening. He said he was all ready to tell the people over
there how awful his situation was and the fact that he was
down 50%, and he said, I was with people who basically had
their entire business schlep completely. They can’t even enter
their stores anymore. And I had absolutely nothing to say. I
kept my mouth shut the whole time because nothing was hurt.
Not even one little knickknack in my shop was hurt.
So again, I think it’s easy
to have the knee-jerk reaction of you’ve got to help
Chinatown, but at the same time, if we’re ever going to get
out of our ethnic mentality, we’ve really got to step up and
become American and say let’s be responsible for ourselves.
Audience Member:
Actually also education. In
the area of the grants, there’s the same thing. It used to be
that there were some minority oriented grants. He says no
longer do we have to give an outcome based on what you get.
What is your outcome?
I think we have to have a
certain data or something that you can go with it and tell
people, this is happening, therefore we have to get something.
And I think that’s also a process of education. We have to
learn the procedure and protocol and we have to play with that
kind of protocol. I think the leadership here, we can ask them
to go to educate the people on how to maneuver the political
situation and financial situation in this country.
Edward Watkins:
I just have to say one
thing. For the purposes of funding or grants or money coming
into a particular community, from what I’ve heard just being
around in the workshops, for whatever agencies that grants
funds and monies, there is an office of Civil Rights.
Education, Health and Human Services, whether it’s the
Department of Education – all of them have offices of civil
rights in their agencies. And where you feel that either your
community – and based on what I see with these vast amounts of
reports and researches, it sounds to me that they haven’t read
any reports.
Based on the presentations,
you have ample information or data, and you might need some
more to absolutely make a case that your community is being
denied funds, to make a civil rights case out of it. I’m not
saying, why don’t you just go out and frivolously do anything,
but whether it’s air quality to health to mental…
If you’re not getting a
piece of that apple pie to help your constituency or to help
your citizens who have been effected by 9/11 – whether it’s
health, employment, civil rights, housing, you have to stand
up to the plate, research your rights, document it…you’ve got
enough scientists running around here doing reports and
documentation on the facts of 9/11 on Chinatown and your
community that you should have ample information to make a
case to any government agency as to why you’ve been denied due
process of federal funds, or state or city funds, to bring it
in. But not to just go out and take a shotgun approach to it
and hope it lands somewhere. Because, again, we’re here and
we’re playing by the rules of whatever the game is and we have
to master those particular if it’s going to benefit one’s
community, whether it’s black, white, Asian, whatever. That’s
all I have to say.
Dr. Hiroko Karan:
One more question.
Audience Member:
I thought I had a question
for Renata, but now after hearing you speak maybe I don’t have
a question. Maybe we have a difference of correction. I’m
Robert Lee. I’m with the Asian American Arts Center. I think
there’s one thing missing in this conference and other ones
that have been held about 9/11, and it was pointed to by Alex
Chu this morning, when he said that what this whole event has
shown is that Chinatown is unplugged. It’s not plugged in. We
can’t get our story across. That’s the biggest thing. He
didn’t have a story for that. But I believe that the time has
come for culture and the arts in Chinatown.
This is the biggest asset
that we have, that we have over looked. Other institutions,
like the Guggenheim utilize the Chinese culture and other
Asian cultures to make a big change in the economic well being
of Soho or other places, yet we ignore it. If we’re going to
pull our community together, we have to focus on the arts. I
just want to let you know.
We’re doing this big thing
with NYU. We’re having a conference to talk about these things
with the political leaders of Washington D.C., the Borough
President and other political leaders. It’s a big expedition
of what we’ve been doing for the last 20 years. I’m showing 80
artists out of the 1,000 Asian artists that we have shown. I
do want you to know about that.
I’m bringing this up because
culture has been missing from conferences like this. What the
arts can do for our community has been missing from
conferences like this. The closest this conference has gotten
to this, I thought, was to invite Renata here. However, I
think that in your bringing stories in English, to the
American public and to Asian Americans, and the way you do is
different from the way…I didn’t get your name? Wendy, how you
bring stories, because you’re bringing them in Chinese. But
what Alex was saying was we’re unplugged, we’re not connected.
And to get connected, we need to be able to tell our stories
across our ethnic borders.
Now you’re saying that we
have to get our of our ethnic borders, but I’m thinking that I
have to get into my ethnicity and therefore share it with the
larger community that hasn’t got an idea about what that is.
When you bring out those human nature stories about victims,
about people who get can’t get a job, Americans might listen
to the films that you make and then hear the humanity in our
Asianess. But then they also take note of those different
characteristics – those Asian, and they think oh they’re
Chinese. But deeper than that are the differences between
their Jewish humanity or Protestant humanity, and our Chinese
humanity and that to me is the biggest question that we
present to the United States.
To me, the presence of
Asians in the United States presents this question. They’re
all freaked out about it and they don’t know what to do about
it in the same way that they don’t know what to do about
Islamic people, people from the Middle East, and that’s why we
have all these conflicts in the world. My feeling is that we
need to address these conflicts of the world, face up to them
and apply them not only to the well being of our community,
but to the well being of ourselves. That’s how culture works.
I would hope that when you do those stories, or when you do
your stories that you would realize that we’re unplugged
largely – not because we don’t stand up for our rights that
are there for us – but largely because we’re not getting our
story out to people who don’t hear it in their terms, in the
terms of their humanity to be able to understand our humanity.
So I just wanted to get this out because we as an organization
have been there for 27 years (30 years if you count the
basement).
We are going to make a push
because if there is any time that Chinatown is going to get
united, maybe it’s now. We’re going to make a push starting
with this conference and afterwards we’re going to see the
role of the arts in changing the economy of Chinatown, in
changing the way we perceive ourselves and how we should be in
the United States, what we should be concerned about – not
just how much money we earn, not just how whether we’re
getting the rights we deserve, but whether we’re being
understood as human beings, and being accepted as human
beings, and being able to share with human beings who are
different from us and who then understand who we are.
Dr. Hiroko Karan:
Thank you for your comments.
And thank you to all the presenters.
Click
HERE to go back up.